A comparative study of promising filter materials for neutron imaging facilities
Abstract
The effect of sapphire and bismuth single-crystal filters and their combinations on the quality of neutron radiographic images and neutron tomography data has been studied. The parameters of the contrast of the neutron image were analyzed depending on the monocrystalline filters. Neutron transmission spectra were obtained for sapphire and bismuth single crystals. Additionally, the effect of filters on the overall intensity of the thermal neutron beam and the background of gamma-rays was investigated. Based on the obtained data, we assume that a single-crystal sapphire filter can be most effectively used for radiographic and tomographic installations using thermal neutrons.
About the Authors
K. M. Nazarov
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, Dubna; L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University; The Institute of Nuclear Physics Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
S. E. Kichanov
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
E. V. Lukin
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
I. Yu. Zel
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
D. P. Kozlenko
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
T. K. Zholdybayev
The Institute of Nuclear Physics Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty
B. Muhametuly
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; The Institute of Nuclear Physics Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
M. Kenessarin
The Institute of Nuclear Physics Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan; Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan
Almaty
A. V. Rutkauskas
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
A. Yskakov
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research; L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University; The Institute of Nuclear Physics Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Kazakhstan
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
M. O. Belova
Joint Institute for Nuclear Research
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Dubna
References
1. P. Vontobel et al., Physica B. 385-386 (2006) 475-480.
2. I.S. Anderson, R.L. McGreevy, Bilheux H.Z. Neutron imaging and applications: A reference for the imaging community (Springer, New York, 2009) 342 p.
3. A.E. Craft et al., Physics Procedia 88 (2017) 73-80.
4. A.El. Abd et al., Construction and Building Materials 256 (2020) 119471.
5. S.E. Kichanov et al., Physics of Particles and Nuclei Letters 17 (2020) 73-78.
6. R.F. Ziesche et al., Nature Communications 11 (2020) 777.
7. I.Yu. Zel et al., Acta Geodynamica and Geomateralia 17-3 (2020) 259-267.
8. N. Kardjilov, G. Festa, Neutron Methods for Archaeology and Cultural Heritage (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017) 349 p.
9. E.H. Lehmann et al., Neutron News 26 (2015) 6-10.
10. E.H. Lehmann et al., Physics Procedia 69 (2015) 10-17.
11. V.A. Somenkov et al., Journal of Surface Investigation 13 (2019) 870-876.
12. Z. Kis et al., Physics Procedia 69 (2015) 40-47.
13. K. Nazarov et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 982 (2020) 164572.
14. B. Muhametuly et al., Journal of Surface Investigation 13 (2019) 877-879.
15. J. Soltes et al., Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 749 (2016) 012041.
16. D.S. Hussey et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
17. Section A 542 (2011) 9-15.
18. D.P. Kozlenko et al., Physics Procedia 69 (2015) 87-91.
19. D.P. Kozlenko et al., Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 13 (2016) 346-351.
20. N. Kardjilov et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 651 (2011) 47-52.
21. F. Ott et al., Physics Procedia 69 (2015) 67-70.
22. L. Crow et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research
23. Section A 634 (2011) 71-74.
24. W. Kockelmann et al., Physics Procedia 43 (2013) 100-110.
25. H.F. Nieman et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 51 (1980) 1299-1303.
26. J.P. Barton et al., Non-destructive Testing and Evaluation 16 (2001) 95-110.
27. O. Aizawa et al., Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology 23 (1986)
28. -564.
29. B.M. Rustad et al., Review of Scientific Instruments 36 (1965) 48-54.
30. R. Born et al., Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section
31. A 262 (1987) 359-365.
32. M. Adib et al., Czech J Phys 55 (2005) 563-578.
33. D.F. Mildner et al., Journal of Applied Crystallography 31 (1998) 835-840.
34. M. Adib et al.,Radiation Physics and Chemistry 31 (2003) 81-88.
35. M. Adib et al., Annals of Nuclear Energy 29 (2002) 1119-1130.
36. T.J. Collins, Biotechniques 43 (2007) 25-30.
37. C.A. Schneider et al., Nature Methods 9 (2012) 671-675.
38. F. Brun et al., Advanced Structural and Chemical Imaging 3 (2017) 4.
39. M.R. Ay et al., Physica Medica 29 (2013) 249-260.
40. H. Alsleem et al., Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences 59 (2012) 49-55.
41. D. Kozlenko et al., Crystals 8 (2018) 49-55.
42. A.P. Kaestner et al., Physics Procedia 88 (2017) 258-265.
Review
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by a grant from the Plenipotentiary Representative of the Republic of Kazakhstan at JINR, Russia (p.6, No.435 from 31.05.2021).
For citations:
Nazarov K.M., Kichanov S.E., Lukin E.V., Zel I.Yu., Kozlenko D.P., Zholdybayev T.K., Muhametuly B., Kenessarin M., Rutkauskas A.V., Yskakov A., Belova M.O. A comparative study of promising filter materials for neutron imaging facilities. Eurasian Journal of Physics and Functional Materials. 2021;5(4):169-180. https://doi.org/10.32523/ejpfm.2021050401
Views: 1121
Email this article 